• << December 2024 >>
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7
    8 9 10 11 12 13 14
    15 16 17 18 19 20 21
    22 23 24 25 26 27 28
    29 30 31
    Labor Headlines

    US labour news headlines from LabourStart

    US proposes to end subminimum wage for disabled workers
    NUHW Southern Cal Kaiser Workers Strike For Pensions, Wages & Better Conditions For Their Patients
    Starbucks Ice Skating Parties Illegally Left Out Union Workers
    After two years without a contract, unionized Chipotle workers call for nationwide boycott
    IKEA distribution center workers take action for fair wages and rights
    Important Links
    United Healthcare
    Vision Insurance - EyeMed
    FRA
    Grand Lodge
    Your Track to Health
    Railroad Retirement Board
    AFL-CIO
    Aetna Dental
    LECMPA - Wage Protection Insurance
    Operation Lifesaver
    BNSF CLC Lodging Complaint
  • MRL - Minimum Force Dispute
    Updated On: Apr 09, 2024

    The 2023 Implementing Agreement between the BRS and BNSF gave MRL signalmen exclusive rights to all future scope covered work. This was not something we previously had on the MRL as the Carrier had the right to use contractors n many cases and did so frequently.  As a condition of the recent agreement, contractors were allowed up to 3 years to finish their previously contracted PTC project only.  And even this exception was conditional.  The condition was that the Carrier must maintain at least 35 MRL signalmen.  If less, then contractor work must be suspended within 60 days.  On January 10th, the BRS became aware the Carrier had allowed the number of MRL signalmen to fall below 35.  Accordingly, as of March 10th, when the number had not been restored to 35, contractors were prohibited from doing any signal scope work on the former MRL territory. 

    BNSF was given a proposal outlining what it would take for the BRS to allow continuation of the project with contractors.  We simply offered a solution in line with priorities collected from affected members. Our terms were quite reasonable, especially considering the conundrum the RR found itself in.  Despite this fact, BNSF rejected our terms and opted to remove contractors from signal scope work until the number of MRL signalmen reached 35. As of March 11th, there were 30 members working, and 4 prospective new hires who had accepted an employment offer on the former MRL.

    The Carrier’s removal of the Contractors was short lived, however. With utter disregard for the clear terms of the Agreement, on March 21st the BNSF informed the Organization that, despite not yet having 35 members working, it would resume Herzog operations immediately.  This was under the guise that prospective employees who had verbally accepted an employment offer could somehow be counted as working members.  On March 22nd, the Organization informed the Carrier that having a plan to get to 35, though commendable, was not the same as having 35 BRS members working on the MRL. 

    That same date, the BRS filed a lawsuit in Federal Court seeking a declaratory judgment in favor of the BRS and further enjoining the Carrier from utilizing contractors to perform PTC work whenever our members are fewer than 35.  We are awaiting the outcome of our suit which we expect will be expedient.

    In the meantime, please be diligent in documenting dates, times and numbers of contractors performing Signal work in violation of the agreement.  Pictures are also helpful.  Please provide all relevant information to your local chairman for handling.


  • Burlington Northern Santa Fe General Committee

    Copyright © 2024.
    All Rights Reserved.

    Powered By UnionActive


  • Top of Page image